Have a word with yourselves FA

In the late hours of Friday evening a policeman witnessed a woman raping a man behind the Black Horse Public House in Chorley. Greater Manchester Police released this statement;

Police Cunstubble Dowd witnessed what he thought was a woman and a man having a bit of fun behind the pub, it turned out that the man did not give his consent and was being held at knife point. When the woman appeared in court the judge had to release her without charge as this incident was witnessed by a police officer therefore was deemed a "matter being dealt with".

Would you expect to see this in your local rag ? No of course you wouldn't. Yet this is exactly how the FA have been behaving recently so what makes them believe they can get away with it? A poorly written rule book is the problem. As it was a player from outside the top 4 (i.e. Ben Thatcher on Mendes) the rule book was re-written. Surely the FA need to take a long look at themselves.

Blue Tones

This entry was posted on February 13th, 2009 at 06:42:37 pm and is filed under News.

Trackback address for this post

Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

12 comments

Comment from: hahahahahahaha [Visitor]

You must be off ur head this article is mental hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha lmao

13/02/09 @ 19:03

Comment from: Trish [Visitor]

Raving bonkers! The worst thing i've ever seen on here.

13/02/09 @ 19:18

Comment from: Blueski [Visitor]

Unfortunately the dry wit of your story was too high brow for the previous posters and they didn't quite "get it".

You will need to dumb it down for them I'm afraid.

13/02/09 @ 20:13

Comment from: CITY FAN [Visitor]

d!ckhead! whats this got to do with city u sad prick

13/02/09 @ 20:23

Comment from: fifthcolumnblue [Visitor]

Looks like there are a lot of people not getting the story!

Perhaps if you referred directly to SWP some of our slower colleagues might twig what you are talikng about.

P.S. - They don't like us much do they?

13/02/09 @ 20:31

Comment from: mongos [Visitor]

these guys playin the im so smart act its 100% obvious what the article is about but it does not excuse it being a rubbish insane article. and as for you fifthcolumnblue if ur so smart, your referrin to ppl as ur colleagues who are not u mongo

13/02/09 @ 22:21

Comment from: mikecfc [Visitor]

It does not take a lot of intelligence to "get" the story and it's true meaning. It is however fairly offensive in it's context and maybe a little too strong for a football blog, maybe an analogy of a burglar being seen by a Policeman "letting himself in" to a house would of sufficed. After all, this isn't the Sun newspaper!!!

14/02/09 @ 00:08

Comment from: jo the toffee [Visitor]

The point is strong but the analogy is just too stupid to grace your normally excellent page.

14/02/09 @ 01:44

Comment from: Rob Fielding [Visitor]

Exactly who sits on the FA panal?
More importantly....
which teams do they follow?
In the interests of transparency I think the football fans all need to know how these 'Judge Judys' dispatch their version of justice.

14/02/09 @ 07:55

Comment from: clevblue [Member]

It was a strong analogy, although the FA's actions are so shocking it pales by comparison really.

We intend to highlight the FA's inconsistencies wherever we can, the intention is to provoke people into responding and we understand the "crazy" terms, but I can assure you BT is only crazy when somebody attacks our club.
Clevblue

14/02/09 @ 10:40

Comment from: Blue Tones [Visitor]

I think some people are missing the whole point, yes it is a shocking analogy but this would never happen in the real world would it. What the FA do is just as silly as this analogy and shows how inconsistent they are. I believe the rule book at the FA has so many Grey areas as to protect their darling clubs when they need to and to punish the clubs they deem non conformant like ourselves.

14/02/09 @ 15:51

Comment from: Trish [Visitor]

Christ there are some patronising replies here.
It wasn't that i didn't 'get it,' i just thought it came across as a very poor way of making the point and i stand by that opinion.
Even if it was 'intentionally silly' i still think the point could have been made in a much better way.
Some people are just unbelievably smug.

15/02/09 @ 15:12

Comment feed for this post

mancityblues.com